River Expert Answers
You have River questions. We have answers.
Home River Fact Sheet River Glossary English River Glossary Spanish/Español River Glossary French/Français River Articles River Tags Related Websites Link to Us About Site Tree

We are a proud member of the Expert Answers Knowledge Network.

More Expert Answers

The Expert Answers Knowledge Network is licensed under a Creative Commons.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons.


RSS Feeds

Expert Answers » River

River Tags

River Expert Answers

Source: water babies, A

Tag based links for

The following links have been tagged River by users just like you, because these resources are off-site we cannot guarantee the accuracy or quality of any third-party information.

  1. Climatic control on rapid exhumation along the Southern Himalayan Front: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 222, No. 3-4. (15 June 2004), pp. 791-806.Along the Southern Himalayan Front (SHF), areas with concentrated precipitation coincide with rapid exhumation, as indicated by young mineral cooling ages. Twenty new, young (80% of the annual precipitation. AFT cooling ages reveal a coincidence between rapid erosion and exhumation that is focused in a ~50-70-km-wide sector of the Himalaya, rather than encompassing the entire orogen. Assuming simplified constant exhumation rates, the rocks of two age vs. elevation transects were exhumed at ~1.4±0.2 and ~1.1±0.4 mm/a with an average cooling rate of ~40-50 °C/Ma during Pliocene-Quart ernary time. Following other recently published hypotheses regarding the relation between tectonics and climate in the Himalaya, we suggest that this concentrated loss of material was accommodated by motion along a back-stepping thrust to the south and a normal fault zone to the north as part of an extruding wedge. Climatically controlled erosional processes focus on this wedge and suggest that climatically controlled surface processes determine tectonic deformation in the internal part of the Himalaya.

    Source: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 222, No. 3-4. (15 June 2004), pp. 791-806.

  2. PCB sources, transformation s, and contributions in recent Fox River, Wisconsin sediments determined from receptor modeling: Water Research, Vol. 36, No. 14. (August 2002), pp. 3449-3462.The PCB contamination in lower Fox River sediments was investigated in order to identify possible PCB sources, contributions, and transformation s, using two receptor models. Congener specific sediment PCB data from sites immediately upstream of DePere dam to Green Bay that had been gathered for the Green Bay/Fox River Mass Balance Study, were used in this analysis. The first receptor model is a self training factor analysis (FA) model with non-negative constraints that was applied to identify the PCB sources and significant congener patterns. The second is a chemical mass balance model (CMB) in which published Aroclor sources, inferred from our FA model, were used to apportion these Aroclors to each sample. The FA model indicated two significant factors, the major one being Aroclor 1242 and the other, a profile dominated by low chlorinated congeners, indicating a possible PCB alteration profile. This profile had significant contributions to samples at or around sites with total PCB concentrations higher than 50 ppm, indicating a potential anaerobic dechlorination activity. It was also deduced from the FA model that very small contributions of more highly chlorinated Aroclors may be present in the system. The results from the CMB model confirmed that the system is dominated by Aroclor 1242. Its average contribution was 95%, with small amounts of Aroclor 1254 (2%) and 1260 (1%). Two of the samples, located in the vicinity of point sources, showed high contributions of Aroclor 1016 by the CMB model. This is interpreted as an altered Aroclor profile resembling the less chlorinated Aroclor 1016. Contributions obtained form the CMB and FA models show similar patterns.

    Source: Water Research, Vol. 36, No. 14. (August 2002), pp. 3449-3462.

  3. Linking land use, erosion and sediment yields in river basins: Hydrobiologia, Vol. 410, No. 0. (1999), pp. 223-240.Result s obtained from erosion plots and catchment experiments provide clear evidence of the sensitivity of erosion rates to land use change and related human activity. Evidence for the impact of land use on the sediment yields of world rivers is less clear, although examples of rivers where sediment yields have both increased and decreased in recent decades can be identified. The apparent lack of sensitivity of river sediment loads to land use change reflects, at least in part, the buffering capacity associated with many river basins. This buffering capacity is closely related to the sediment delivery ratio of a river basin, in that basins with high sediment delivery ratios are likely to exhibit a reduced buffering capacity. Investigations of the impact of land use and related human activity on sediment yields should consider the overall sediment budget of a catchment rather than simply the sediment output. Information on the sediment budget of a drainage basin is difficult to assemble using traditional techniques, but recent developments in the application of fingerprinting techniques to establish sediment sources and in the use of environmental radionuclides, such as caesium-137 and lead-210, to document sediment storage offer considerable potential for providing such information. Sediment storage within a river basin can give rise to environmental problems where sediment-assoc iated pollutants accumulate in sediment sinks. The accumulation of phosphorus on river floodplains as a result of overbank sedimentation can, for example, represent an important phosphorus sink.

    Source: Hydrobiologia, Vol. 410, No. 0. (1999), pp. 223-240.

  4. Distribution and seasonal biomass of drift macroalgae in the Indian River Lagoon (Florida, USA) estimated with acoustic seafloor classification (QTCView, Echoplus): Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 326, No. 1. (6 December 2005), pp. 89-104.Three areas of the Indian River Lagoon, Florida (USA) were surveyed to show seasonal changes in the distribution and biomass of macroalgae and seagrass. Acoustic seafloor discrimination based on first and second echo returns of a 50 kHz and 200 kHz signal, and two different survey systems (QTCView and ECHOplus) were used. System verification in both the field and a controlled environment showed it was possible to distinguish acoustically between seagrass, sparse algae, and dense algae. Accuracy of distinction of three classes (algae, seagrass, bare substratum) was around 60%. Maps were produced by regridding the survey area to a regular grid and using a nearest-neighb or interpolation to provide filled polygons. Biomass was calculated by counting pixels assigned to substratum classes with known wet-weight biomass values (sparse algae 250 g m- 2, dense algae 2000 g m- 2, seagrass 100 g m- 2) that were measured in the field. In three study areas (Melbourne, Sebastian Inlet, and Cocoa Beach), a dependence of algal biomass on depth and season was observed. Seagrass most frequently occurred in water less than 1 m deep, and in November, seagrass beds tended to be covered by dense algae that also extended up- and downstream of shoals in the Lagoon. In March, the pattern was similar, with the exception that some areas of previously dense algae had started thinning into sparse algae. Macrophyte biomass was lowest in May in the Melbourne and Cocoa Beach study areas, with the opposite situation in the Sebastian Inlet study area. In May, seagrass areas were largely devoid of dense algae and most algae accumulations were sparse. In August, dense algae covered large areas of the deep Lagoon floor while shoals were largely free of algae or had only sparse cover. We suggest this summer pattern to reflect moribund algae being washed from the shallows to deeper channels and from there being removed from the lagoonal ecosystem either through tidal passages into the open ocean or by degradation and breakdown in situ. The differences between the study areas indicate high spatial and temporal variability in biomass and distribution of macrophyte biomass in the Indian River Lagoon.

    Source: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 326, No. 1. (6 December 2005), pp. 89-104.

  5. Fluvial landscape models and catchment-scal e sediment transport: Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 39, No. 1-2. (October 2003), pp. 31-51.The need for the ability to make quantitative predictions regarding the transport of sediment within watersheds and from watersheds to the sea has never been more important than it is today. Sediment transport is at the heart of a surprising number of practical problems, ranging from the prevention of soil loss to the tracking of contaminants, and this has resulted in a rich but scattered literature. In many of these contexts, observational data has been used to develop empirical sediment transport laws. For example, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) has been developed for use at the farm-plot scale, and the equation of Syvitski et al. [Water Resour. Res. 36(9) (2000) 2747] was developed for the world's largest river basins. In the context of fluvial geomorphology, several different but closely related sediment transport laws have been used to construct fluvial landscape models. The sediment transport formulas used by these models are a generalized form of several physically based bed-load transport formulas. Based on studies of fluvial landscape models, we now know that many measurable attributes of channelized landscapes, such as junction angles, Horton ratios, hydraulic geometry exponents, valley geometry, and longitudinal profiles, vary in a predictable manner with a few well-constrain ed, physical parameters. One important consequence of this success in forward modeling is that it is now feasible to solve the inverse problem of calculating regional sediment transport parameters from measurements (such as long profiles) that can easily be made from digital elevation models (DEMs). This may also make it possible to make a rational selection between alternate sediment transport laws. Since fluvial landscape models represent the state of the art in catchment sediment transport modeling, the three-fold purpose of this paper is to: (1) explain the key concepts and simplifying assumptions that are common to these models; (2) explain how several current models differ from one another; and (3) highlight a few of the significant results that have been obtained in recent years. While serving mostly as an expository or overview paper, some new results for a steady state fluvial landscape model are also included.

    Source: Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 39, No. 1-2. (October 2003), pp. 31-51.

If you would like to find additional social bookmark based links on the topic of River we recommend the Open Tag Directory > River. If you would like to find related tags we recommend Tag Patterns > River.



River Tag Pages: 1


River Tag Pages: 1



Powered by Odin Assemble 2.5a